acensor
Well-known member
danpatgal said:...As much as we love our iMiev, we probably did incur a greater environmental impact (and spent a bit more) by having purchased it as compared to having just kept my current car and bicycled more (as I have done a lot - but less so now with the EV).
Some of my rationalization to do it now was how it might affect others. As rare and expensive as an EV might be, it's a better transition for most people used to driving a gasoline car than cycling, for example. .......And collective purchases will help fund future development and lower costs as larger scale manufacturing kicks in. I think that if despite the "range" issue, if the costs (without rebates or credits) would be on par with a similar gasoline car, many more would buy one.
Of course, it is really nice and fun to drive. That is worth something.
In MHO your rationalizations have some real merit, Dan:
If no one buys this first-generation (at least first commercially serious generation) of EV's there will be no energy for further ones or other lower footprint initiatives from the big players or the government. Similarly if no one sees them out driven by real human beings (not just folks who can afford $100K toys.)
And you can't put a price easily on "fun to drive."
So who knows, maybe I'll be back here.
If our local dealer makes us an very tempting offer on his demo car (if he holds it until the 2013's or, say, the Smart EV comes out it'll depreciate on his lot) it could be one we can't refuse.
By the way: EV's may make even more ecological sense in Oregon and Washington state than other places, as 48% of Oregon's electricity come from non-carbon producing sources, mostly hydro... some other renewables.
Alex