Search results

? digikey.so ? did you mean somalia???

we are all the same! watch out your shelfs! they bend under burden :) I send you my adress via pm best regards

Hi dexter... the ad202 fix is very ok, yes for sure. the trick is, I still don't have the evidence for the real culprit, and I don't like that. adding a resistor is like cheating with the measurment, it is not good for long term. I revert the schematic and simulate it , Vadimchik1973...

HI If you're interested in, you should have a look on my topic. https://myimiev.com/threads/isa215-hyd-module-reverse-engineering-involved-in-p1a15-error-condenser-charge-timeout.5490/ and re-consider the 'resistor fix'

as I told before.... stifness is largely hampered by pcb milling (creepage purpose) , pin holding only at each end of the board and heavy component in the middle.

I really don't know what was in designer's head . adding a resistor into a power line is a newbee fault, logical circuit really don't like that. moreover if it is for filtering purpose, the guy added a cap in // so he also jeopardise the "filter behaviour", it is ridiculous.

okay, here find my sch in pdf print shape. added value (they are crazy to add such a R inline with the power!), also renumbered all topos you can zoom in as far as you want :)

do you have the inline power resistor value? it is steange to see such resistor jeopardise a voltage... it should be very low

so you didn't like my one?

right, sorry I assume R value 270 and caps value 270n and 150n

Hi could you remind me R and C value for the LPF output best regards

so ratio for this xformer is 2:1. good!

excellent ! I think we are close to the goal : my proposal for the schematic with your last update bellow it is quite normal to have the R divider to feed 4066 with transformerr signal. because of the topology , max voltage seen on the transformer rise up to 2xVcc, here about 30V (transformer...

You will consider me as a psycho! I realize that circuitery could be exactly as our friend Kiev sketch it... the point is ... the control line of ALL the CMOS are connected together.. it is indeed visible on picture. ... so they are ALL switched together also.. but not all the time. I think that...

okay... so by reading the DS, duty cycle is pushed to the max when pin 3 is down to zero.. right. And deadtime input , with the RC circuitry is a kind of soft start as well. good.

mmm , yes... and if you power the board with 12V what is the voltage on that pin? pin 3 is the comparator input for PWM, as the internal current generator drawn 700µA I cannot imagine the voltage to be stuck to zero. unless one error amp pushs the pin3 to the max PWM value

I'm very interested about those resistances value : two solutions 1/power the board with a known voltage and measure resistor divider voltage or 2/desolder one of them to measure each one. who can do that?

for the one who is interested in , below another example with 4066: https://lz3nf.wordpress.com/2013/07/25/280/

oscillator ramp is between 0V to 3V, so voltage divider output, when board is 15V powered, should be somewhere around 1.5V if 50% DC is required best regards

I think I know. TL494 runs as a free PWM generator , open loop . But the duty cycle must be nevetheless fixed. So the input pin feedback must be set to a precise voltage. This voltage is compared to the oscillator ramp ( have a look to functionnal block diagram). It is the purpose of this...